From the History News Network
What Do You Call It When a Big Country Takes a Chunk of a
Small One? Greed (And We Should Know)
By David Lee McMullen
A greedy nation amasses a large
military force on the border with its neighbor, a young nation that only a few
years earlier threw off the shackles of an empire to declare its
independence. The intent is a massive
land grab, pure and simple.
Some might
think I am referring to Russia and the Ukraine in 2014, or perhaps Germany and
Poland in 1939. I am not. I am talking about the United States and
Mexico in 1846, a war that ultimately allowed the U.S. to annex most of the
modern Southwest.
It seems odd,
given all the commentary about the current crisis, that no one has made the
connection, because the Mexican War is a harsh reminder that the United States
has been guilty of the same type of aggression.
Mexico won
its independence from Spain in the 1820’s, after a decade of bloody
fighting. They established a republic, modeled
on the U.S. and based in part on the U.S. Constitution. They created a central government and a
nation of states, even naming their new country Estados Unidos
Mexicanos – the
United States of Mexico.
To protect
the central Mexican states from Comanche attacks, and to forestall the
expansionism of its northern neighbor, Mexico invited settlers to come to what
is now modern Texas. New settlers were
offered large land grants in exchange for becoming Mexican citizens, respecting
Mexico’s abolition of slavery and adopting the Catholic religion.
The offer was
accepted by thousands of U.S southerners, many of them slave owners, who sought
to expand slavery westward. They
accepted the land from Mexico, but failed to live up to their promises. It was this group that rebelled against
Mexico in the 1830’a and established the Republic of Texas.
After
accepting Texas as a state, the U.S. sought to buy much of the modern
Southwest. Mexico declined our
offer. In response, the United States
moved an Army south to the Rio Grande, into territory claimed by Mexico for the
purpose of sparking a conflict. From Mexico’s perspective, it was an invasion.
The war that
resulted lasted two years, and involved American forces who invaded central Mexico,
capturing both the capital and the country’s major port, Veracruz. In addition, the U.S. mounted naval and military
operations in the Mexican territories of California and New Mexico. It was the
first of many times during the next century and a half that the United States
flexed its power against Mexico and other Latin American nations, openly or
covertly.
When the Mexican
War was finally over, the U.S. forced Mexico to surrender a vast amount of
territory, land stretching from the Texas border to the Pacific Ocean. As a result, relations between our two
countries were poisoned for decades, something that can be seen today in the
unequal partnership between our two nations.
Of course, there
are differences between the Mexican War of the 1840’s and the current standoff
between Russia and the Ukraine, including Russia’s long history of domination in
the region and the large number of ethnic Russians living in the Ukraine. Yet the underlying issue is very much the
same, a larger, more powerful nation using brute force to take what it wants,
leaving its weaker neighbor to nurse its wounds with little or no recourse but
to accept its fate.
Despite our best diplomatic efforts, Russia
has annexed Crimea and now is threatening to take control of the eastern half
of Ukraine. Military action by the U.S.
or NATO would be unwise. Remember, it was Germany’s invasion of Poland
in 1939 that sparked the start of World War II in Europe, forcing Britain and
France to abandon their diplomatic efforts and declare war on Germany.
The reality of the current crisis is
that there is little the United States can do to resolve it without risking
war. As we watch the events unfold, perhaps
we should recognize that America does not always hold the moral high ground.
Copyright 2014. All rights reserved
Copyright 2014. All rights reserved
Comments
Post a Comment